Global Web of Financial Connections in Burger King’s Deal for Tim Hortons
Burger King is an American icon that has served up flame-broiled Whoppers and fries for six decades.
But with a deal to buy
the doughnuts-and-coffee chain Tim Hortons on Tuesday, it will soon
become a Canadian company majority owned by a Brazilian investment firm —
with the assistance of the American billionaire Warren E. Buffett.
In announcing their
$11.4 billion merger, Burger King and Tim Hortons declared their
intentions to become a truly global fast-food empire whose offerings
span from breakfast to dinner.
But executives devoted
more time during their tightly planned introduction on Tuesday tamping
down outrage over whether Burger King was moving to Canada to lower its
tax bill than talking up the merits of the deal.
The acquisition
highlights the ever-higher ambitions of Burger King’s majority owner,
the relatively low-key 3G Capital. In just six years, the firm, backed
by one of Brazil’s wealthiest men, has taken over Burger King and the
ketchup colossus H.J. Heinz and helped orchestrate the megamerger of the beer giants InBev and Anheuser-Busch.
The 3G combination of
operating prowess and hyperefficient cost-cutting — it has clamped down
on expenses as small as color copies at Burger King and mini-fridges at
Heinz — has won the investment firm plaudits from the business world.
And it has no bigger admirer than Mr. Buffett, who is a longtime friend
of the 3G co-founder Jorge Paulo Lemann and was a partner in buying
Heinz last year for $23 billion.
“They’re very smart. They’re very focused,” Mr. Buffett said about 3G this year at the annual meeting of his company, Berkshire Hathaway. “When you make a deal with them, you make a deal with them.”
Now 3G and Burger King
are looking to bring their expertise to Tim Hortons, which has become a
Canadian national symbol that covers three-quarters of its home
country. Greeting voters at Tim Hortons’ drive-through windows and being
photographed with one of the company’s distinctive brown paper cups is
almost obligatory for Canadian politicians.
“This is a phenomenal
asset,” Daniel Schwartz, Burger King’s chief executive, said in an
interview. “This is a business we can own forever.”
Though 3G had weighed
the possibility of a Tim Hortons deal for some time, it and Burger King
began formal talks with Tim Hortons earlier this year, according to
people briefed on the matter.
For Tim Hortons, led
by the chief executive Marc Caira, a merger with a more global
counterpart could help fulfill its own international ambitions.
“Tim Hortons should
very clearly be a global brand,” Mr. Caira said. “With Burger King and
3G, I can definitely get there faster.”
Executives and bankers from Lazard, the Royal Bank of Canada and Citigroup
shuttled between Ontario, New York and other cities over several months
to work on the deal, these people said. Advisers quietly worked out the
details for a merger of “Red” and “Blue,” the code names for Tim
Hortons and Burger King.
One point that became
clear was the need to assuage wary Canadian regulators, who have the
power to block deals they deem not in the country’s best interests.
Though Tim Hortons was already once owned by an American company, Wendy’s, both companies put in provisions aimed at preserving Tim Hortons’ Canadian trappings.
The combined company
will be based in Canada, where its biggest market is. And Tim Hortons
will still be run out of its home base in Oakville, Ontario. Burger King
will be operated from Miami.
While the opposition
New Democratic Party, which has ties to organized labor, has called for a
strict review, few analysts expect the takeover to be rejected, or the
federal Conservative government to demand significant conditions for
approval.
Mr. Buffett, eager to
again invest with his Brazilian friends, entered the picture early on as
well. Berkshire agreed to buy $3 billion worth of preferred stock,
which carries an annual dividend of 9 percent, to help finance the deal,
on top of $9.5 billion in debt financing arranged by JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo.
Once the deal was
announced, advisers to both companies treated themselves to Tim Hortons
coffee and doughnuts. Mr. Schwartz opted for a “double double,” Canadian
for a coffee with two sugars and two helpings of cream.
Under the terms of the
deal announced on Tuesday, Burger King will pay 65.50 Canadian dollars
in cash and 0.8025 of one of its shares for each Tim Hortons share. That
amounts to about 94.05 dollars, or $85.78, a share, based on Burger
King’s closing price on Monday.
Shares of Burger King
fell 4 percent, to $31, after rising nearly 20 percent on Monday. Shares
of Tim Hortons surged 8 percent, to $81.05.
Since news of the
talks emerged this week, customers and lawmakers have worried that the
deal would be a corporate inversion aimed at trimming Burger King’s tax
rate.
Mr. Schwartz argued on
Tuesday that his company’s tax rate, now about 27 percent, would remain
about the same even after the deal closes. Even before 3G bought Burger
King, the company had already taken some moves to reduce its taxes.
Still, customers flooded the company’s Facebook
page with angry comments. “If you attempt to buy Tim Hortons for the
purposes of evading US Taxes, I will NEVER step foot in another Burger
King again,” one user wrote. Some Tim Hortons consumers appeared
dismayed about their daily coffee stop losing some of its hometown
character.
“In my naïveté, I’m
disappointed because I think Tim’s is Canadian and now it’s going to be
owned by Americans — well, Brazilians,” said Linda Ladouceur as she made
her way into a store in an Ottawa residential neighborhood for a
coffee.
Though Ms. Ladouceur acknowledged that she disliked Tim Hortons coffee, preferring McDonald’s, Dominic Franceschina, who accompanied her, said that the chain had something special that its competitors lacked.
“It’s a social thing, more than anything else,” he said. “In Britain, they have the pubs. In Canada, we have Tim Hortons.”
Correction: August 26, 2014
An earlier version of this article misstated the given name of Burger King's chief executive. He is Daniel Schwartz, not David.
An earlier version of this article misstated the given name of Burger King's chief executive. He is Daniel Schwartz, not David.
Source : http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/08/26/burger-king-to-buy-tim-hortons-for-11-4-billion/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0


Comments
Post a Comment